The Tax Masterstroke: How Sachin Tendulkar Became an 'Actor' to Save Crores
1 month ago | 5 Views
The name Sachin Tendulkar is synonymous with cricket, but the legendary batsman once scored a major victory off the field by successfully arguing he was an 'artist' and 'actor' for tax purposes.
The Legal Googly: Section 80RR and Foreign Income
The dispute centered on Section 80RR of the Income Tax Act, which, at the time, offered a substantial tax relief (up to 30% deduction) to specific professionals like authors, musicians, artists, actors, and sportsmen who earned income in convertible foreign exchange from their professional work abroad.
Between 2001 and 2005, Tendulkar had received a substantial amount—nearly ₹5.92 crore—in foreign exchange from global brands like PepsiCo, ESPN-Star Sports, and VISA for various endorsements and commercials.
The Income Tax Department’s Bouncer
The Income Tax Assessing Officer (AO) immediately rejected Tendulkar's claim, bowling a sharp bouncer at the cricket legend.
The department’s argument was straightforward:
Cricketer, Not Actor: Tendulkar’s primary profession was that of a cricketer.
His income from advertisements was merely incidental to his fame as a sportsman. Endorsements Are Not Sport: The money was paid for his appearance in commercials, not for playing cricket internationally, which was the intended scope for 'sportsmen' under the section.
Merely endorsing a product, they argued, does not make him an actor or artist.
The department contended that the endorsement money should be taxed fully, treating it as 'Income from Other Sources,' not professional earnings eligible for the 80RR deduction.
Sachin’s Unorthodox Defence: 'I Am an Artist'
Never one to back down from a challenge, Tendulkar, through his counsel, presented a unique and highly creative defence that effectively redefined his role in front of the camera.
His argument hinged on two key points:
Multiple Professions: A person can have more than one profession.
He argued that while he was a cricketer on the field, he was functioning as an 'actor' or 'model' when he faced the camera for commercials. He even declared his income from playing cricket as 'Income from Other Sources,' while his endorsement income was listed under 'Income from Business/Profession.' Artistic Skill Required: He asserted that appearing in an advertisement or commercial was an artistic performance that required a degree of imagination, creativity, and skill—qualities essential to the profession of an artist or actor.
Not every cricketer could perform effectively in an advertisement, proving a unique, non-cricketing skill was at play.
The ITAT’s Verdict: A Tax Law Sixer
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ultimately sided with the Master Blaster.
The ITAT observed that while Tendulkar’s cricketing success certainly added to his brand value, his appearances in commercials required him to use his own unique skills, imagination, and creativity—qualities that qualified the activity as an 'artistic' profession.
By classifying his foreign endorsement earnings as income derived from the 'profession of an artist,' the ITAT allowed him the deduction under Section 80RR.
Read Also: The Golden Age of Glamour: Janhvi Kapoor's Vintage Cavalli Signals the Ultimate Y2K Comeback
Get the latest Bollywood entertainment news, trending celebrity news, latest celebrity news, new movie reviews, latest entertainment news, latest Bollywood news, and Bollywood celebrity fashion & style updates!
HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!




