Introduction: A Polarizing Supreme Court Ruling

The Supreme Court’s recent directive to relocate all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to shelters has ignited a fierce debate across India. While some applaud the decision as a step toward public safety, others, including animal rights activists and celebrities, argue it’s inhumane. Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma (RGV) has entered the fray with a provocative stance, slamming dog lovers for what he calls “selective sympathy” and questioning why the suffering of human victims, especially children, seems to be overlooked.

RGV’s Bold Critique of Dog Lovers

On August 16, 2025, RGV took to X to express his unfiltered views, supporting the Supreme Court’s order to address the stray dog issue in Delhi-NCR. In a series of posts, he listed ten points challenging animal activists, accusing them of prioritizing dog rights over human lives. He argued that while pet owners shower love on their pedigreed dogs in luxurious homes, stray dogs pose a deadly threat to the poor. “Rich people pet high breeds. Poor people get mauled and killed by strays. That’s the class divide dog lovers don’t talk about,” he wrote, highlighting a stark social disparity.

The Heart-Wrenching Question: “Why Don’t Dead Children Matter?”

RGV’s most striking point was his question about society’s compassion—or lack thereof—for children harmed by stray dogs. Referencing a tragic incident where a four-year-old was killed by strays in broad daylight, he questioned why such incidents don’t spark the same outrage as the Supreme Court’s ruling. “Where was your compassion then? Or is it reserved only for those with wagging tails?” he asked, urging dog lovers to consider the pain of families who lose loved ones to dog attacks.

Challenging Selective Sympathy

Varma didn’t hold back in accusing dog lovers of practicing “selective sympathy.” He argued that while it’s fine to love pets at home, preaching compassion for strays while ignoring their victims is insensitive. He challenged activists to adopt strays themselves, asking, “Why don’t you take them home? Is it because they’re dirty, diseased, or you don’t want to risk your family’s safety?” His rhetoric underscored the need for balanced compassion that doesn’t come at the expense of human lives.

The Class Divide and Public Safety

RGV emphasized that stray dog attacks disproportionately affect marginalized communities living in open areas, not gated societies. “The dog menace prowls in streets and slums, where children play barefoot,” he noted, pointing out that the privileged are insulated from these dangers. He called for practical solutions, suggesting that dog lovers either adopt strays or push for systemic changes like better shelters, rather than burdening vulnerable communities with their ideals.

Conclusion: A Call for Balanced Compassion

RGV’s stance, while controversial, brings attention to a critical issue: balancing animal welfare with human safety. He concluded that while animals deserve to live, it shouldn’t come at the cost of human lives. His provocative question—“Why don’t dead children matter?”—challenges society to rethink its priorities and find humane, equitable solutions to the stray dog crisis.

Read Also: Shah Rukh Khan’s Inspiring Journey: Hard Work, Talent, and National Award Triumph for Jawan

Get the latest Bollywood entertainment news, trending celebrity news, latest celebrity news, new movie reviews, latest entertainment news, latest Bollywood news, and Bollywood celebrity fashion & style updates!

HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!