The return of a star player after a long injury layoff is usually a moment of pure celebration, yet Rishabh Pant’s much-awaited comeback to competitive cricket was quickly overshadowed by an unexpected controversy. Leading the India A team against South Africa A in Bengaluru, the dynamic wicketkeeper-batter took to the field sporting a jersey number that immediately sparked a social media firestorm: the iconic No. 18, a number synonymous with the legend, Virat Kohli.

While Pant’s performance on his return was crucial for his fitness, it was the digital number on his back that stole the headlines, raising questions about protocol, tribute, and the fine line between an administrative oversight and a deliberate move.

The Iconography of No. 18: Why the Fuss?

For millions of cricket fans globally, the number 18 is not merely a digit; it’s an emblem of Virat Kohli's career. It’s the number he has worn since his Under-19 days and carries deep personal significance, being the date his late father passed away.

Following Kohli’s retirement from Test cricket earlier this year, a strong wave of public sentiment emerged, urging the BCCI to retire the No. 18 jersey in all formats, similar to the tributes paid to Sachin Tendulkar's No. 10 and MS Dhoni's No. 7. The board, however, has not taken any official action yet, leaving the number technically available. This cultural weight attached to the jersey is precisely why Pant’s choice instantly became a topic of intense, polarized debate.

BCCI Clarification: An Accidental Allotment?

For a brief period, fans speculated whether Pant, whose regular international number is 17, had made a permanent switch, perhaps as a tribute or even a symbolic assertion. However, the controversy found a logical counterpoint in the form of a clear statement from a senior BCCI official.

The official clarified that the selection of jerseys for India A matches or unofficial Tests is entirely distinct from senior international games. In these lower-level matches, jerseys are generally unpersonalized—they do not feature player names—and players simply pick an available kit off the rack.

The Official Stance: "In India A squads, there are no fixed numbers as jerseys do not have names. Anyone can pick any random number. The jersey numbers are only sacrosanct for international games."

This explanation strongly suggests that Pant’s donning of the No. 18 was likely an accidental allotment in the kit room, not a calculated decision to stir up drama.

 Not the First Time: A Recurring Theme

Interestingly, this is not the first instance of a player facing fan backlash for wearing the hallowed number since Kohli’s Test retirement. Fast bowler Mukesh Kumar was seen wearing No. 18 during an unofficial Test against the England Lions a few months prior, an event that also led to widespread criticism from devoted fans who deemed it "disrespectful."

Despite the logical clarification regarding India A protocol, the emotional reaction highlights the profound connection fans have with the iconic number. For many, the sight of a new player wearing No. 18 feels like an unceremonious handover, irrespective of the match rules.

Ultimately, while the controversy ignited social media, it was an administrative detail—the relaxed jersey protocol for India A games—that appears to be the most likely cause. For Rishabh Pant, the true focus remains on his recovery and using these matches to secure his rhythm and a spot back in the senior squad for the upcoming Test series against South Africa.
Read Also: Redemption Arc: Jemimah Rodrigues Rises Above the Storm to Script World Cup History
Get the latest Bollywood entertainment news, trending celebrity news, latest celebrity news, new movie reviews, latest entertainment news, latest Bollywood news, and Bollywood celebrity fashion & style updates!
HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!